Parashat Ki Teitzei
Elul 14, 5772 ~ Sept 1, 2012
by Alex Hart
Elul 14, 5772 ~ Sept 1, 2012
by Alex Hart
She
knelt down before her, a movement so seamless, it appeared choreographed as she
stepped away from the cast, before blowing her a kiss. In that moment, Laura’s
eyes lit up and I could only succumb to the wisdom of the branding; Disney is
‘The Happiest Place on Earth’. From 2 feet off the ground, Sleeping Beauty’s
Castle is a wonder, the parades magnificent and the fireworks, well, words
failed our little people. It all comes down to perception. If you play by the
Disney rules you can give in and be merrily transported alongside barriers for
pop-up shows, wait, with formally undiscovered reserves of patience, in lines
for rides over in an instant and dispense with the vague hope of finding snacks
being anything but a short-lived energy shot. The kids didn’t notice and
instead, daily since our return, they narrate their mental snapshots of their time
away. We hope that these images remain indelibly magical in their memories
forever.
In
Parshat Ki Teitzei, the Torah’s perception in its meting out of the punishment
for the wayward son, looks many years ahead. The son, presented to the Beth
Din, is referred to as a glutton and a drunk by his parents (יח פסוק כא פרק).
The punishment is death by stoning; sekilah; the most severe death
penalty. Many pages of explanation are devoted to this halacha. We are to
understand the gluttony was to have been the consumption of meat, together with
becoming inebriated from drinking wine, in the company of loafers and
criminals. Astonishingly, the term ‘Ben Sorer u-Moreh’ refers only to a boy
aged between 13 and 13 ¼. Insights into the Talmud, Sanhedrin 68b, delve into
the boundaries as to when a boy is fit to be considered a ‘Ben Sorer U’Moreh’.
For example, Rav Yehudah advises that punishment is applicable only when the
son reaches the strength of an adult; Rashi understands this to be the
beginning of adulthood; the Netziv teaches that liability is once the son
reaches the age of Bar Mitzvah and Tosfot interprets the Gemara to be referring
to the son right after his Bar Mitzvah. It stands to reason that a person of
that age would not have the money for such items, unless by theft. The Talmud (Sanhedrin 71a) teaches that the
boy is put to death because of what he will eventually do, rather than what he
has done. In having stolen, the Torah
can foresee the natural progression of events. All the more so, the Kotzker Rebbe
suggests ‘al shem sofo’ ‘according to his end’ refers to the end of this
appellation ‘moreh’. Translated here as ‘rebellious’, the word can also mean
‘teacher’ i.e. that he would lead others to behave likewise; killing him with
the most severe form of death would deter others. Undaunted by the united scolding of his
parents (the source of their prerequisites is to be found in Sanhedrin 71a), he
would loot once again. Having a taste for delicacies, his appetite could
eventually lead the young adult to intricate heists. For a rebellious son’s
conviction, he must have been warned in front of 3 witnesses (in this
circumstance, a witness could even be a judge). The court could hand down the
punishment of lashes. If the wayward behavior were to continue, one could
perceive that neither a single experience nor any individual could prevent the
son from even murdering for which the penalty is indeed sekilah. With relief I
add that the complexities into the requirements to be derived from this passage
to secure conviction of a rebellious son are such that none were, nor ever
will, be killed. Rav Hirsch suggests that it comes down to chinuch, education.
The perception is that with his education, a boy arriving at his Bar Mitzvah
should be thrilled at the opportunity to contribute and the potential for
increased responsibility. The parents should burst with hope and encouragement,
that the novelty and care devoted to unfurling and laying tefillin will never
diminish but instead, provide in time the welcome adjunct to the familiar
comfort of daily morning Tefillah.
If we
take a moment to assess the make-up our community, it can be noted that a
significant percentage of families feed into Beth Jacob singularly because of
Gan Mah Tov’s existence. The preschool
is a place where our children’s spirits are nurtured and the mensch in each tot
is enhanced. This year marks the 25th since the Gan was founded and the apple
tree, just outside its doors, was planted. Hoping that you have now received
the order forms for GMT’s Rosh HaShana cards, one of the preschool’s major
fundraisers. The chinuch of our kids is a partnership. It is a combination of
us as parents ‘Listen my son to your father’s instruction and do not forsake
your mother’s teaching’, together with Gan Mah Tov’s Morim, promoting gentle
civility with the still quiet voice at playground level, providing tender
guidance and displaying a kindly outlook that will ensure our community’s
longevity. Your support towards the Gan’s programming is warmly welcomed.
כתיבה
וחתימה טובה